Steak and Blowjob Day
|
Posted:Mar 14, 2005 9:16 pm
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
4576 Views
|
I just heard about this proposed new holiday for this month of March - Steak and Blowjob Day. (No, I am not making this up - do a search on Google if you want.) Some websites say it's supposed to be on the 14th, others say the 20th. So I guess there is no consensus on the date just yet. The concept is a novel one though. I would just like to know whether anybody thinks this holiday idea will catch on or not.
|
|
|
5
Comments
|
|
TV commercials for erectile dysfunction drugs
|
Posted:Mar 13, 2005 8:14 am
Last Updated:Jul 30, 2013 1:20 pm
5040 Views
|
I was just seeing a TV commercial for a drug called Levitra. The commercial mostly has a MILF-type woman praising the drug while giving a devious little smile.
Since Levitra is a prescription drug, it is a requirement for the commercial to disclose side effects. The male voice-over says what they are, things like headaches and nausea, and then concludes with, "In the rare case of erections lasting over four hours, seek immediate medical attention."
So what would EMT's or a hospital emergency room do when they get a guy like that? I would think that the guy would just keep fucking his lady instead anyway, and the lady would just be too orgasmic and euphoric to notice the time passage.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Couples on this site who say "No single males"
|
Posted:Mar 12, 2005 8:16 am
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
4605 Views
|
"Who's Viewing Me?
Find out who's checking you out."
The feature on this site I really enjoy is the one which lets me know who has viewed my profile. What I have noticed for quite a long time now is how many views I get from the profiles of couples. (I am already quite experienced with the joys of straight MFM, thanks to this site!)
What I have noticed is that some of these couples who view me state in their profiles that they are not interested in single men, but only bi or bi-curious women. So why do they view me anyway? My guess is because hubby and wifey do not fully agree on the issue of what they want from this site, and that she is the one who views me while hubby is away from their computer. I have even had this confirmed to me by quite a few wives over the past two years. Sometimes, I will get a request for a private IM through this site from such a couple, only to have the chat abruptly end without warning. Hmmm - did the wife have to click our chat session off suddenly because she heard the husband approaching? That would've been my guess.
My experience on this site with viewing some of these couples after they have viewed me leads me to a theory of my own. My theory is that there are some husbands out there who create their profiles as a means to get a woman on the side for themselves, by exploiting the bisexuality of their wives.
These men are simply too insecure and jealous to ever consider their wives' hidden desires to try sex with another man, especially one who is hung better than they are. (I have seen quite a few profile pics to confirm my suspicions for the potential of that whole Freudian thing.) These husbands are likely on the dominant sides of these marriages too, so they are the ones who first come to this site, pay for membership, and write up their profiles entirely. It is the wives who silently suffer as a result; never being able to realize any sort of fantasy they may have which involves a man who is not their spouse.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Wow, I made the list it seems!
|
Posted:Mar 9, 2005 8:40 pm
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
4137 Views
|
Today, I just happened to notice that my blog here is ranked 7th out of 15 in the "Most Popular Male Blogs" list on this site.
I would have never guessed that my musings would be receiving such popularity. It's now making me regret never having pursued any type of writing career in the past.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
An offline hook-up
|
Posted:Mar 8, 2005 7:01 pm
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
4115 Views
|
Just before I went away on business late last month, I went to a house party. At this party, many people were already drunk by the time I arrived. The girl who lived at this house was no exception. She was hanging all over me that night, and took me to her bed after many others left. She let me know how much she wanted to fuck beforehand too. Basically, I would say that she jumped my bones.
This was my first sexual encounter that did not originate from this site in quite a while. I felt the sex was okay, but then again, I already was not expecting that much considering the circumstances.
The part which set me aback was in the aftermath when this girl sent me an e-mail later that week. She claimed that she did not remember much about our tryst, but also said that she thought I took advantage of her. I replied to her e-mail, to point out how she was the true sexual aggressor, and I even quoted back to her all of the provocative things that she said and did that night, like grabbing hold of my package before the party wore down. She wrote back again and conceded to this, but also said she was a bit freaked out by the whole thing.
This is why I think I would prefer to just get my sex from this site. At least I won't get any grief from girls feeling buyer's remorse or second guessing themselves this way. Some girls can't deal with themselves after having casual sex I suppose, and heaven help them if there are any on this site.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Profiles with no pictures
|
Posted:Feb 26, 2005 9:34 am
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
4855 Views
|
I wish there were not so many profiles without pictures on this site, especially with the standard profiles. It's just too easy to create a profile for insincerity's sake, dishonest purposes, or other forms of time-wasting nonsense. Nobody said the picture(s) had to show your face, you being naked, or you engaged in sexual activity, either.
The reasons people give for not posting even one picture or having one to send don't wash with me, either.
No scanner or digital camera? Do what I once did - go to a store that provides picture scanning as a service. It's not that expensive, either. A camera shop that I phoned in Manhattan, New York, about the most expensive place to live in that I know of, told me they could scan up to 15 pictures and put it on a CD-ROM for under 20 bucks. One could easily spend more than that getting a few sheets of wallet-sized film prints made.
You have a high profile job? For the most part, I would argue that people who say that might just be a little too pretentious or full of themselves. Even if such a claim has some merit, there are still many ways to post a picture of yourself without anybody you work with possibly discovering your precious little secret. Some techniques would be to wear a mask or hat with a brim in your picture, obscure your face with photo editing software, or just have the picture show something other than your face. Just use your imagination and your wits.
You're married and trying to be discreet? Well, do you really think your spouse will be able to recognize you by a picture of any part of your body that could be possibly photographed by you? Unless that part of you is distinctively tattooed or bar-coded, I would say nobody is that keenly perceptive, even spouses who've been married to you for many years. Besides, the phrase “plausible deniability” could come into play here. It has worked for certain agencies of national government quite well in the past, and it can work for you too.
You're afraid somebody will digitally alter your picture so as make somebody else's head appear to be on your body, so that they can then put it on a pornographic website? I have only heard this excuse once before. It came from the mouth of a woman whom I would assert is certifiably paranoid schizophrenic. I made the unfortunate mistake of agreeing to meet her too, but that is a whole other story altogether. So get over yourself if you try saying this one to me. There are already plenty enough willing people in this world to pose for pornography pictures. There is simply no need for anybody to go to the trouble of using a picture of your body for such purposes or any other, you wacko! Now, go take your Zyprexin or whatever medication you are supposed to be on, and shut up.
I once received pictures on this site from a girl living in Cuba, the worker’s “paradise”. If somebody such as her, living in perhaps the poorest and most oppressive gulag-style dictatorship ever known, can send me a picture of herself through this site, anybody else could too. So spare me your poverty excuses, please. I’m sure that girl did not make any, although I’m afraid she may have been arrested for going online when Fidel Castro cracked down on such activities not long after she contacted me.
|
|
|
6
Comments
|
|
Women who complain about seeing cock pics
|
Posted:Feb 25, 2005 2:06 am
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
4256 Views
|
Is it just me, or are there a lot of women on this site who complain about seeing cock pics? I don't know what kind of site that they think they are on when they write that. Perhaps they did not notice the caption below the banner logo which reads, "The World's Largest Sex & Swinger Personals site" before they created their profiles, either.
I was in the swinger scene back in the 90’s, long before this site even became as popular as it is today. Personal ads were placed in what were called "swinger contact magazines" back then, and they still are today. These magazines tend to be sold only in adult book stores, because of their graphic sexual content, of course.
Anyway, I did not see any women complain about getting cock pics in these magazine ads like I do now on this site. This is how I know that this site has a lot of people on it now who are not real swingers or even on the same page as real swingers. Women and couples who were in the contact magazines always required seeing pics of a guy's body, face, and cock as a way of making sure that they wanted to really meet him. They would've surely risked wasting their time if they had had no such requirements.
AdultFriendFinder is supposed to be for swingers, and real swingers don't whine about seeing pics of other people's genitalia or judge people who wish to express themselves in such a fashion.
|
|
|
3
Comments
|
|
Dubious testimonials on profiles
|
Posted:Feb 20, 2005 9:12 am
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
3870 Views
|
When testimonials for profiles on this site became a feature last year, I thought it was a really great concept. Of course, I also assumed that the one who writes a testimonial for somebody has ACTUALLY MET the person in real life. I am now seeing many instances where this simply is not the case. I've seen a lot of men and even women who write testimonials for others to express how much they admire or want to meet the person they are writing about. All of my own testimonials are from people whom I've actually met, with just one exception. There are many others on this site who have testimonials by the ton from such people, i.e., people whom they have never met in real life. Some profiles apparently have nothing but this kind of testimonial.
So what is wrong with this? For the most part, I submit that this practice is a bit farcical. Online, people can easily make themselves seem what they are truly not. Only personal interaction can reveal one's true character to others. What exacerbates this problem is when the subjects of such raving testimonials use images STOLEN FROM XXX ADULT WEBSITES on their profiles, images which catch the admiring eyes of the unwary. It's a shame that so many people are so easily duped like that, but their ignorance only adds to the veneer of such rampant deception I witness far too often on this site.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Your vs. you're
|
Posted:Feb 17, 2005 9:24 am
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
4073 Views
|
I'm tired of seeing so many people on this site and elsewhere confuse the possessive adjective "your" with the contraction "you're". So allow me to set the example here:
"You're" is short for "You are:"
"You're the best at sucking my cock."
"Your" is a possessive adjective:
"Your vibrator sounds like a power saw.".
That wasn't difficult now, right?
And one more thing: If YOU'RE (not "your") an adult female here on AdultFriendFinder, you can refer to yourself as a "womAn" if you would like, but not a "womEn". (That one switch of "a" to "e" changes the word from singular to plural.) Well, if you have multiple personality disorder, perhaps you can call yourself a "women". You will otherwise seem very ignorant by getting these simple usages of the word so wrong.
|
|
|
9
Comments
|
|
The Crazy Frog from Jamster!
|
Posted:Feb 16, 2005 8:30 am
Last Updated:Jan 9, 2007 2:53 pm
3830 Views
|
Has anybody seen these inane TV commercials from something called "Jamster!"? It's something to do with downloads for mobile phones. I noticed a character they call "The Crazy Frog". He's this CG blue frog who wears nothing but a motorcycle vest, helmet, and goggles. He also happens to have a tiny penis dangling between his legs.
So far, I've not heard about anybody complaining about this gratuitous display of male genitalia on television, despite the uproar over last year's "wardrobe malfunction" by Janet Jackson. Is this because the frog has a millimeter peter? What if he were depicted as having a giant erect dong and testicles instead?
I suppose this provides proof that in our society's conventional wisdom, an exposed penis is inoffensive as long as it is limp and miniscule. In that case, I guess I'd better shelve my designs for crotchless shorts this summer.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
Female teachers and sex crimes
|
Posted:Feb 13, 2005 11:45 am
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
3745 Views
|
Has anybody noticed how many female teachers have made the news lately by getting arrested for having sex with younger boys? There have been about five seperate cases lately across the nation. These teachers are almost all blonde and really hot too.
The thing I'm wondering about now is whether there are even more homely or unattractive female teachers out there who want young boy cock but just can't get any.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Facts for bitter AdultFriendFinder men to consider
|
Posted:Feb 11, 2005 9:42 am
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2006 9:27 pm
3734 Views
|
In the chat rooms, I've all too often seen where some male whines about how hard it is to hook up here on AdultFriendFinder, or that the chat room is a "sausage party". What they need to consider is the male to female ratio here on AdultFriendFinder. You can do the math and see what I mean.
There are now over 16.4 million AdultFriendFinder members worldwide. Of that number, I would say that there has to be about a dozen men for every woman. I'm not even taking couples into account here, either. In my home state of New Jersey alone, there are 161,591 men seeking women, while only 10,474 women seeking men. Those numbers calculate into about 15 to 16 men for every woman.
Guys, I'm sorry if all this gets you depressed, but it's reality. Post a pic on your profile to improve your chances if it doesn't have one already.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Introduction
|
Posted:Feb 10, 2005 5:41 pm
Last Updated:May 30, 2006 8:05 pm
3441 Views
|
This is my first blog entry. It is my hope that I will be able to report my successes with AdultFriendFinder. However, I can already report that my existing experience withAdultFriendFinderhas not been completely satisfying. Only time will tell whether my experiences will improve.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
To link to this blog (vengeur) use [blog vengeur] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
61
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
